cheap wine is better especially when you drink it warm and wearing cheap sunglasses

jc wrote:

i thought you brought the war into this thread. i mean, you are mad at the french beacuse they didn't go to iraq with us, right. or, are you just opposed to good wine.

No, I thought you would fit in with the Frenchmen because they are all pussies. Had nothing to do with the war. See you don't know anything about me, you just think I fall into one or more of those catagories.

jc wrote:

fred wrote: I'm pretty sure the majority don't do any hairy butt poking. but they did say you can't discrimate based on race/gender/etc when you rent your houses.

No jc, the minority(Federal Courts) said what the home owners can and can't do. The Majority never got to vote on that one.

mctopeka wrote:

jc wrote: fred wrote: I'm pretty sure the majority don't do any hairy butt poking. but they did say you can't discrimate based on race/gender/etc when you rent your houses. No jc, the minority(Federal Courts) said what the home owners can and can't do. The Majority never got to vote on that one.

that is correct!

They also say you go to jail longer for punching a GayGuy or a darkie in the eye than you do if you punch a white man or white woman.

maybe depends on the reason why you hit them I would guess

Why would that matter? Would it matter why a dark gay guy hit a white guy?

sure maybe the dark guy thought the white guy was trying to steal his wallet when in turn the white guy was just wanting to touch the dark guy
s hairy ass.

Hooray for California....... While they are perfectly fine with me NOT being able to marry Two Beautiful Wives...... With much Fanfare and Gusto would they applaud me entering Communial Bliss with an Ugly Old Hairy Queer.

No wonder the Arabs think we're Nuts.

mctopeka wrote:

How can forcing the majority of Californians that voted against it, be getting it right? So much for the sanctity of marriage out there. Well at least the other states won't have to recognize their marriage. The only people happy about this are the gays and the Attorneys out there in California that will represent them in their divorces. If you think their Courts are crowded now wait until they allow the gays to get married.

At one time in America, the majority of "voting" people thought slavery was acceptable. And see how that changed. Same could be said for women's right to vote, segregation and inter-racial marriage. What the fuck does the "majority" know?

mctopeka wrote:

jc wrote: fred wrote: I'm pretty sure the majority don't do any hairy butt poking. but they did say you can't discrimate based on race/gender/etc when you rent your houses. No jc, the minority(Federal Courts) said what the home owners can and can't do. The Majority never got to vote on that one.

those anti-discrimination laws are from the civil rights act of 1968. it was passed by a majority of our elected officials. it is the law and it is the will of the majority. and, even if it wasn't, racial discrimination in housing is wrong and should not be permitted.

mctopeka wrote:

jc wrote: i thought you brought the war into this thread. i mean, you are mad at the french beacuse they didn't go to iraq with us, right. or, are you just opposed to good wine. No, I thought you would fit in with the Frenchmen because they are all pussies. Had nothing to do with the war. See you don't know anything about me, you just think I fall into one or more of those catagories.

tell the truth, mc, you're just mad at the french because they are smarter abour iraq than you are.

fred wrote:

Why would that matter? Would it matter why a dark gay guy hit a white guy?

lots of minorities and gays get punched without it being a hate crime. just not by people like you.

BanditBacker wrote:

No wonder the Arabs think we're Nuts.

i'm sure they would welcome you and your pro arab beliefs in one of the middle-east nations. mc is tired of all the rules in america, too - maybe you boys could share a place.

BT wrote:

mctopeka wrote: How can forcing the majority of Californians that voted against it, be getting it right? So much for the sanctity of marriage out there. Well at least the other states won't have to recognize their marriage. The only people happy about this are the gays and the Attorneys out there in California that will represent them in their divorces. If you think their Courts are crowded now wait until they allow the gays to get married. At one time in America, the majority of "voting" people thought slavery was acceptable. And see how that changed. Same could be said for women's right to vote, segregation and inter-racial marriage. What the fuck does the "majority" know?

the germans liked to use a doctrine of "gesundes volksempfinden" "(what all well meaning people think is right"). and all those "well meaning people" did with that little nugget was gas millions of people they didn't like.

Hey, should the courts be able to stop women from killing babies?

fred wrote:

Hey, should the courts be able to stop women from killing babies?

i'm sure there are very strict laws against ANYONE killing a baby.

There used to be.

fred wrote:

There used to be.

still are.

Not since 1973.