Tornado WIN...................... On Our Way To A 3Peat.....

3-2 got to love a win, Whinecats wouldn't know what that feels like.

The Tornado barely win, then they try and start a fight after the game is over.....

Tornado fowards have not scored a goal in 123 minutes according to cheeks and there should be a lot of concern by this team......

I look for Tornado to slump in January big time, Look for Wildcats to pull it together and Bandits to just get better....Finish up Bandits, Wildcats, Tornado........Wait and see dumb ass.

Way to go Goober Grabbers!
Congrats on the narrow win tonight!

Re: Tornado WIN...................... On Our Way To A 3Peat.

Tornado Fan wrote:

3-2 got to love a win, Whinecats wouldn't know what that feels like.

Last time I looked, the Wildcats had won a few. Even SF can beat the mighty TT. This is a tough division. I like to see how these teams would do against teams in other divisions. I don't think we can count any of the south teams out as division champs. There's still a lot of hockey left in the regular season.

A win is 2 points it doesn't matter if it's 1 point or a million you still only get 2 points.

How many did the Whinecats get tonight?????????????????????????????

0

Tornado Fan wrote:

A win is 2 points it doesn't matter if it's 1 point or a million you still only get 2 points. How many did the Whinecats get tonight????????????????????????????? 0

Now that my fellow posters, is about the most stupid post I have ever seen!

The Dufus is talking about points then says "it doesn't matter if it's 1 or a million". Does that make sense to yall? It dont to me!

Pucked Up Fan wrote:

Tornado Fan wrote: A win is 2 points it doesn't matter if it's 1 point or a million you still only get 2 points. How many did the Whinecats get tonight????????????????????????????? 0 Now that my fellow posters, is about the most stupid post I have ever seen! The Dufus is talking about points then says "it doesn't matter if it's 1 or a million". Does that make sense to yall? It dont to me!

Doesn't make sense to me either. I think he's forgetting the big goose egg they got last night when they were shut out.

I agree with you pucked up........I think he is only 12 years old.....

Bandits won 5-1 and only received 2 points and we won 3-2 and only received 2 points. So it don't matter if it's 1,000,000 to 1 it still 2 points in the standings.

You are still a fat dumbass Tornadon't Fan! Stupid Assed vortex!

Tornado Fan wrote:

Bandits won 5-1 and only received 2 points and we won 3-2 and only received 2 points. So it don't matter if it's 1,000,000 to 1 it still 2 points in the standings.

Thanks for clearing the point system up for us. Most of us are new to hockey and don't understand.

Twinblade2 wrote:

You are still a fat dumbass Tornadon't Fan! Stupid Assed vortex!

I'm fairly new to the Texarkana area (go Bandits) and to this board. But this Tornadofan really gets uner your skin. In another forum for another league one of the posters was like this person .. would make stupid comments and got under everyone's skin. He enjoyed it. Most people learned to just ignore him and his comments. Eventually he was banned. This poster probably won't go away easily so just ignore him and let the teams sort this out. Just my worth.

wffan

Quote:

The Tornado barely win, then they try and start a fight after the game is over.....

And where may I ask were you sitting? I don't recall seeing any WF fans in SF tonight. Or are you a psychic who can see the game in your crystal balls?

He sure does like to whine about the Wildcats, doesn't he?

Cheeks said it on the radio that one of the Tornado players was going at it with I believe Vosberg.

Let me start off with saying, I was unable to even listen to the game, much less be there. I am just replying to what I have read here on this thread.


That said, wffan, does it not take two to start an altercation? Granted, I am not saying that it would surprise me that the Tornado player started it, but you have to remember that this is a very heated rivalry from the "old days" (two years ago) when the Roadrunners were known as the Calvary and played at North Richland Hills, TX. Therefore, there is plenty of bad blood in this series between the two teams despite the distance between them.

My point is that these things usually start with one player saying something to the other and the nonsense, especially at the end of the game, ensues because of what was said. While it can make for a very interesting last game of the series, if you were not there, and not actually involved in the altercation, but just listening to something you heard on a webcast, how can you be sure it was initiated by the Tornado player? Again, I am NOT saying it would surprise me, but to blame it on the Tornado player without being part of the discussion itself seems to be a bit foolish to me.

I really am not trying to start anything here, and have tried to stay out of the whole WF fans vs TT fans garbage as we have never had any problems with WF fans (in our rink or yours), and do not believe any of you guys have had any issues with my family at the games. But, I still want to know how even Cheeks would know who actually started it if he was not even on the ice, and how you could automatically, without being at the game accuse one player (from either team) of starting the altercation?

Let's see now....

It is December...the Tornado win a game...and they are ALREADY talking 3peat?!?!?

I could have sworn there were another 3 months of hockey BEFORE the playoffs even started.

I was there, There was a little bit of a scuffle at the end of the game - nothing big.

Why do people call it a "3Peat"? This is really dumb. Think about it for a second. If you win a championship, what is it called? That's right, just a "win", or a "title" or a "crown" or whatever it is you are playing for. Now let's just say you win whatever it is twice in a row. What do you call it then? Yup, a "repeat" - take a bow, you're good. Now... this whole "3peat" baloney just doesn't fit in to normal logic. Let's skip this "3Peat" hogwash just for a sec... Let's say you win it 4 times in a row. WOW! Four times... What do you call it now? A "4Peat"? Nope. A "Quattro-Peat"? Nah, that ain't it either. You could call it "4 in-a-row", or "4-Time Defending Champ", maybe a "4-Time Winner" or something to that effect. Even further, let's examine Mr. Armstrong. This guys wins the Tour de France 7 times --- in a row! So, do we call his seven in a row a "7Peat" or Sept-Peat"? Nah... you can't do it. Say this out loud, "Way to go Lance on your 7Peat!". Dumb, huh? Yeah, it is. What you need to say is that he is the 7-Time Tour de France winner/champion. That works and it is also logical.

Okay, let's go back, shall we, to this "3Peat" anomaly. Why are people calling it that? 'Cuz it rhymes? Well that is just plain stupid and needs to be re-thought. So I say we scrap all this "3Peat" nonsense, because that is all it really is, nonsense. Let's call it the "Trifecta" or "The Triple" or "3-Time"; but not "3Peat". It's just bad.

i like your way of thankin Slappy......stopped by the package store on the way home did ya?

Good Man!